Project Details
Description
DESCRIPTION (Applicant's abstract): This study will develop improved
statistical methods for two aspects of clinical trials analysis:
quality-of-life (QOL) and treatment compliance. Researchers increasingly
consider QOL data in evaluating new therapies, especially in trials for cancer
and other chronic diseases. QOL data contribute most when combined with
clinical information on survival, since decisions about therapy should address
both factors. Unfortunately, missing data problems plague this area of
research, complicating statistical analysis. QOL data are often nonignorably
missing, since subjects who miss assessments tend to have poor QOL or health
status; this makes standard statistical analyses at best difficult and at worst
biased and uninterpretable. The proposed work, will (i) analyze QOL in a
time-to-event framework, extending survival analysis methods in this unique
setting to jointly analyze QOL and clinical outcomes; and (ii) develop
diagnostic techniques to assess and evaluate the extent of the nonignorable
missing data problem Treatment compliance in clinical trials is generally
imperfect. Compliance data can contribute to analyses of treatment effect. An
ongoing debate among both statisticians and clinicians centers on "as-
randomized" (AR, or "intent-to-treat") vs. "as-treated" (AT) analyses. The
former approach groups subjects according to their randomization, value,
regardless of compliance with the treatment regimen, the latter according to
actual treatment received. The proposed work will (i) develop an AT approach
that allows intermediate levels of compliance, and (ii) extend this approach to
longitudinal data.
Status | Finished |
---|---|
Effective start/end date | 7/1/00 → 6/30/04 |
Funding
- National Cancer Institute: US$115,088.00
- National Cancer Institute: US$115,088.00
- National Cancer Institute: US$115,088.00
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Statistics and Probability
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.