Are pharmaceuticals cost-effective? A review of the evidence

Peter J. Neumann, Eileen A. Sandberg, Chaim M. Bell, Patricia W. Stone, Richard H. Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

143 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The argument that prescription drugs are cost-effective has been made both by the pharmaceutical industry to support rising drug prices and expenditures, and by advocates of expanded drug coverage for elderly and low-income persons. A new database of 228 published cost-utility analyses sheds light on the issue. According to published data, some drugs do save money or are cost-effective, but the issue depends critically on the context in which the drug is used and the intervention with which it is compared. Cost-utility analyses funded by the drug industry tend to report more favorable results than do those funded by nonindustry sources. Cost-effectiveness analysis can help policymakers to determine whether drugs and other interventions offer value for money.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-109
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are pharmaceuticals cost-effective? A review of the evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this