Clinical Decisions: Determining When to Save or Remove an Ailing Implant

Dennis P. Tarnow, Stephen J. Chu, Paul D. Fletcher

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The basis for the decision to either save or remove an ailing implant is multifactorial, and, as such, it has become one of the more controversial topics in the field of dental implantology. While bone lost to peri-implant disease can now be augmented with increasing predictability, the degree of success still varies depending on the size and configuration of the osseous defect. Concurrently, with the development of improved high-reverse torque instrumentation, minimally invasive techniques can be used to easily remove an implant that is malpositioned, causing an esthetic problem, or showing advanced bone loss. Any eventual decision regarding the retention or removal of an ailing implant must also be balanced with the desires of the patient, who typically will have already invested significant time and money to have the implant initially placed and restored. This article will present the variables involved in the decision-making process for when to save or remove an ailing implant. Clinical examples illustrating the management for these factors will be offered, providing clinicians a variety of alternatives available for managing different clinical circumstances that may be encountered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-243;quiz244
JournalCompendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)
Volume37
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2016

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Decisions: Determining When to Save or Remove an Ailing Implant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this