TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI)
T2 - a modified Delphi study
AU - MODIFI Expert Panel
AU - Brewer, Stephanie K.
AU - Corbin, Catherine M.
AU - Baumann, Ana A.
AU - Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
AU - Jones, Janine M.
AU - Pullmann, Michael D.
AU - Lyon, Aaron R.
AU - Aalsma, Matthew
AU - Aldridge, William
AU - Arean, Patricia
AU - Barnett, Maya
AU - Barwick, Melanie
AU - Birken, Sarah
AU - Brown, Jacquie
AU - Bruns, Eric
AU - Calloway, Amber
AU - Cooper, Brittany
AU - Creed, Torrey
AU - Darnell, Doyanne
AU - Dopp, Alex
AU - Escoffery, Cam
AU - Green, Kelly
AU - Hunter, Sarah
AU - Jungbluth, Nathaniel
AU - Kopelovich, Sarah
AU - Lau, Anna
AU - McLeod, Bryce
AU - Monroe-DeVita, Maria
AU - Moore, Julia
AU - Prusaczyk, Beth
AU - Shelton, Rachel
AU - Stanick, Cameo
AU - Williston, Michael
AU - Wright, Sean
AU - Youn, Soo Jeong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources. Method: MODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability and inclusion (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: In Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application. Discussion: MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective.
AB - Background: Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources. Method: MODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability and inclusion (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: In Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application. Discussion: MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201044722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201044722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s43058-024-00592-x
DO - 10.1186/s43058-024-00592-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 38886834
AN - SCOPUS:85201044722
SN - 2662-2211
VL - 5
JO - Implementation Science Communications
JF - Implementation Science Communications
IS - 1
M1 - 64
ER -