Abstract
This article examines whether minority small business borrowers have the same access to loans from financial institutions as similar white borrowers. Using matching methods, I find that African-American borrowers are rejected at an approximately 30 percent higher probability than similar white borrowers. I also find that the impact of unobservable variables has to be greater than 85 percent the impact of observable variables to show no discrimination. This bound seems to be a high number given that I have controlled for a large number of borrower, firm, and lender characteristics. No such differential effect is found for Asian and other minority borrowers. I also find equal expected default losses between African-American and white borrowers. These results are consistent with the information-based, laissez faire, and group hoarding theories of discrimination, and against the taste-based theory of discrimination.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 756-785 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Journal of Empirical Legal Studies |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 1 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Cornell Law School and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Education
- Law