TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluoxetine treatment of dysthymia in the elderly
AU - Nobler, Mitchell S.
AU - Devanand, D. P.
AU - Kim, Min Kyung
AU - Fitzsimons, Linda M.
AU - Singer, Tara M.
AU - Turret, Nancy
AU - Sackeim, Harold A.
AU - Roose, Steven P.
PY - 1996/6
Y1 - 1996/6
N2 - Background: Despite their prevalence, little is known about the treatment of mild depressive syndromes in older patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluoxetine in dysthymic disorder in the elderly. Method: Twenty-three elderly outpatients with dysthymic disorder (DSM-III-R criteria) entered a 13-week study of fluoxetine (2-week placebo run-in period and 11 weeks of fluoxetine treatment with a dose range of 20- 60 mg/day). Ratings to assess clinical response included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinic Global Impression (CGI), and the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS). Results: Nine patients (39%) had never received psychiatric treatment during the index episode, despite a long duration of illness (mean ± SD = 18.5 ± 17.1 years). Twenty of the 23 patients completed the entire study. The mean ± SD HAM-D (24-item) score decreased from 14.6 ± 3.7 to 7.9 ± 5.0 during the trial, and the CDRS score decreased from 28.1 ± 9.1 to 15.7 ± 10.0. When response criteria of a 50% reduction from baseline in the HAM-D score, final HAM-D score ≤ 8, and a CGI score of 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) were used, 12 (60%) of the completers were responders. Side effects were uncommon, and the fluoxetine was generally well tolerated. Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that fluoxetine is an effective treatment in elderly patients with dysthymic disorder. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are warranted.
AB - Background: Despite their prevalence, little is known about the treatment of mild depressive syndromes in older patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluoxetine in dysthymic disorder in the elderly. Method: Twenty-three elderly outpatients with dysthymic disorder (DSM-III-R criteria) entered a 13-week study of fluoxetine (2-week placebo run-in period and 11 weeks of fluoxetine treatment with a dose range of 20- 60 mg/day). Ratings to assess clinical response included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinic Global Impression (CGI), and the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS). Results: Nine patients (39%) had never received psychiatric treatment during the index episode, despite a long duration of illness (mean ± SD = 18.5 ± 17.1 years). Twenty of the 23 patients completed the entire study. The mean ± SD HAM-D (24-item) score decreased from 14.6 ± 3.7 to 7.9 ± 5.0 during the trial, and the CDRS score decreased from 28.1 ± 9.1 to 15.7 ± 10.0. When response criteria of a 50% reduction from baseline in the HAM-D score, final HAM-D score ≤ 8, and a CGI score of 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) were used, 12 (60%) of the completers were responders. Side effects were uncommon, and the fluoxetine was generally well tolerated. Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that fluoxetine is an effective treatment in elderly patients with dysthymic disorder. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029948373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029948373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 8666563
AN - SCOPUS:0029948373
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 57
SP - 254
EP - 256
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -