Abstract
Introduction: Global guidelines emphasize the ethical obligation of investigators to help participants in HIV-endpoint trials reduce HIV risk by offering an optimal HIV prevention package. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has increasingly become part of state-of-the-art HIV prevention. Here we describe the process of integrating oral PrEP delivery into the HIV prevention package of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial. Methods: ECHO was an open-label randomized clinical trial that compared HIV incidence among women randomized to one of three effective contraceptives. In total, 7830 women aged 16 to 35 years from 12 sites in four African countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa and Zambia) were enrolled and followed for 12 to 18 months, from 2015 to 2018. Part-way through the course of the trial, oral PrEP was provided to study participants either off-site via referral or on site via trained trial staff. PrEP uptake was compared between different contraceptive users using Chi-squared tests or t-tests. HIV seroincidence rates were compared between participants who never versus ever initiated PrEP using exact Poisson regression. Results: PrEP access in ECHO began through public availability in Kenya in May 2017 and was available at all sites by June 2018. When PrEP became available, 3626 (46.3%) eligible women were still in follow-up in the study, and of these, 622 (17.2%) initiated PrEP. Women initiating PrEP were slightly older; more likely to be unmarried, not living with their partner, having multiple partners; and less likely to be earning their own income and receiving financial support from partners (all p < 0.05). PrEP initiation did not differ across study randomized groups (p = 0.7). Two-thirds of PrEP users were continuing PrEP at study exit. Conclusions: There is a need for improved HIV prevention services in clinical trials with HIV endpoints, especially trials among African women. PrEP as a component of a comprehensive HIV prevention package provided to women in a large clinical trial is practical and feasible. Provision of PrEP within clinical trials with HIV outcomes should be standard of prevention.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e25491 |
Journal | Journal of the International AIDS Society |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 1 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.
Funding
The ECHO Trial was funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, US Agency for International Development and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, South African Medical Research Council and UN Population Fund. Contraceptive supplies were donated by the Government of South Africa and US Agency for International Development. IB received funding from the South African Medical Research Council under the SAMRC Clinician Researcher MD PhD Development Programme. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the study funders. The ECHO Trial was funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, US Agency for International Development and the President?s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, South African Medical Research Council and UN Population Fund. Contraceptive supplies were donated by the Government of South Africa and US Agency for International Development. IB received funding from the South African Medical Research Council under the SAMRC Clinician Researcher MD PhD Development Programme. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the study funders. We are grateful to all the women who participated in the ECHO Trial and to the members of the study team and community advisory boards who advocated for PrEP provision. The ECHO Trial was funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, US Agency for International Development and the President?s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, South African Medical Research Council and UN Population Fund. Contraceptive supplies were donated by the Government of South Africa and US Agency for International Development. IB received funding from the South African Medical Research Council under the SAMRC Clinician Researcher MD PhD Development Programme. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the study funders.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
US Agency for International Development | |
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases | UM1AI069463 |
United States Agency for International Development | |
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | |
Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete | |
U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief | |
South African Medical Research Council |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Infectious Diseases