Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference after ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up

Benedict U. Nwachukwu, Spencer W. Sullivan, Ryan C. Rauck, Evan W. James, Joost A. Burger, David W. Altchek, Answorth A. Allen, Riley J. Williams, Struan H. Coleman, Frank A. Cordasco, Stephen Fealy, Jo A. Hannafin, John D. Macgillivray, Robert G. Marx, Michael J. Maynard, Stephen J. O'Brien, Andrew D. Pearle, Anil S. Ranawat, Scott A. Rodeo, Howard A. RoseBeth E. Shubin Stein, Sabrina M. Strickland, Russell F. Warren, Thomas L. Wickiewicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Analyzing outcomes and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is of increased interest in the orthopaedic literature. The purposes of this study were to report outcomes after ACLR at medium to long-term follow-up, identify the threshold preoperative outcome values that would be predictive of achieving the MCID postoperatively, and analyze outcome maintenance at medium to long-term follow-up after ACLR.Methods:Active athletes who underwent ACLR were identified in an institutional ACL registry. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered preoperatively and at the 2-year and >5-year postoperative follow-up; measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and Lysholm scale. We calculated the MCID from baseline to each of the 2 follow-up periods (2-year and mean 7.7-year). Logistic regression was performed to investigate factors associated with achievement of the MCID.Results:A total of 142 patients (mean follow-up, 7.7 years [range, 6.6 to 9.1 years]) underwent ACLR. The mean age and body mass index at the time of surgery were 27.2 ± 13.0 years and 23.2 ± 3.0 kg/m2, respectively. Final postoperative outcome scores improved significantly from baseline for the IKDC (50.9 ± 14.7 to 87.9 ± 11.2), SF-12 PCS (41.6 ± 8.9 to 55.6 ± 3.2), and Lysholm scale (62.2 ± 17.6 to 90.5 ± 10.3) (p < 0.0001), while the SF-12 MCS did not improve significantly (54.2 ± 8.0 to 54.4 ± 6.0) (p = 0.763). Between 2- and >5-year follow-up, the SF-12 PCS showed significant improvement (54.6 ± 4.5 to 55.6 ± 3.2; p = 0.036), while no change was noted in the IKDC (87.6 ± 11.1 to 87.9 ± 11.2), SF-12 MCS (55.5 ± 5.3 to 54.4 ± 6.0), and Lysholm scale (89.8 ± 10.6 to 90.5 ± 10.3) (p ≥ 0.09). At the time of final follow-up, the MCID was achieved by 94.7% of patients for the IKDC, 80.8% for the Lysholm, 79.0% for the SF-12 PCS, and 28.2% for the SF-12 MCS. At 2-year follow-up, 95.3% of patients were either "very" or "somewhat" satisfied with their surgery, compared with 88.6% at the time of final follow-up.Conclusions:We found a high level of maintained function following ACLR. The IKDC, SF-12 PCS, and Lysholm scores improved significantly after ACLR at the time of final follow-up and were not significantly different between follow-up periods. Approximately 95% and 89% of patients reported being satisfied with the outcome of surgery at the 2-year and final follow-up, respectively.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere21.00056
JournalJBJS Open Access
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 11 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 LWW. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Associated with Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference after ACL Reconstruction: Results at a Mean 7.7-Year Follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this