Pregnancy-Related Factors and Breast Cancer Risk for Women Across a Range of Familial Risk

Jasmine A. McDonald, Yuyan Liao, Julia A. Knight, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Mary Daly, Saundra S. Buys, Yun Huang, Caren J. Frost, Irene L. Andrulis, Sarah V. Colonna, Michael L. Friedlander, John L. Hopper, Wendy K. Chung, Jeanine M. Genkinger, Robert J. Macinnis, Mary Beth Terry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Importance: Few studies have investigated whether the associations between pregnancy-related factors and breast cancer (BC) risk differ by underlying BC susceptibility. Evidence regarding variation in BC risk is critical to understanding BC causes and for developing effective risk-based screening guidelines. Objective: To examine the association between pregnancy-related factors and BC risk, including modification by a of BC where scores are based on age and BC family history. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included participants from the prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC), which includes the 6 sites of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (US, Canada, and Australia) and the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium (Australia). Analyses were performed in a cohort of women enrolled from 1992 to 2011 without any personal history of BC who were followed up through 2017 with a median (range) follow-up of 10 (1-23) years. Data were analyzed from March 1992 to March 2017. Exposures: Parity, number of full-term pregnancies (FTP), age at first FTP, years since last FTP, and breastfeeding. Main Outcomes and Measures: BC diagnoses were obtained through self-report or report by a first-degree relative and confirmed through pathology and data linkages. Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for each exposure, examining modification by PARS of BC. Differences were assessed by estrogen receptor (ER) subtype. Results: The study included 17274 women (mean [SD] age, 46.7 [15.1] years; 791 African American or Black participants [4.6%], 1399 Hispanic or Latinx participants [8.2%], and 13790 White participants [80.7%]) with 943 prospectively ascertained BC cases. Compared with nulliparous women, BC risk was higher after a recent pregnancy for those women with higher PARS (last FTP 0-5 years HR for interaction, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.07; P for interaction <.001). Associations between other exposures were limited to ER-negative disease. ER-negative BC was positively associated with increasing PARS and increasing years since last FTP (P for interaction <.001) with higher risk for recent pregnancy vs nulliparous women (last FTP 0-5 years HR for interaction, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03-2.31). ER-negative BC was positively associated with increasing PARS and being aged 20 years or older vs less than 20 years at first FTP (P for interaction =.002) and inversely associated with multiparity vs nulliparity (P for interaction =.01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of women with no prior BC diagnoses, associations between pregnancy-related factors and BC risk were modified by PARS, with greater associations observed for ER-negative BC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e2427441
JournalJAMA network open
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 26 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 McDonald JA et al. JAMA Network Open.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pregnancy-Related Factors and Breast Cancer Risk for Women Across a Range of Familial Risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this