Retaining mandatory securities disclosure: Why issuer choice is not investor empowerment

Merritt B. Fox

doi:10.2307/1073870

Retaining mandatory securities disclosure: Why issuer choice is not investor empowerment

Merritt B. Fox

Columbia Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

99 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1335
Number of pages	1
Journal	Virginia Law Review
Volume	85
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2307/1073870
Publication status	Published - Oct 1999

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Law

Access to Document

10.2307/1073870

Cite this

@article{324e67ca49b04e16a94e41b8156aae3a,

title = "Retaining mandatory securities disclosure: Why issuer choice is not investor empowerment",

author = "Fox, {Merritt B.}",

year = "1999",

month = oct,

doi = "10.2307/1073870",

language = "English",

volume = "85",

pages = "1335",

journal = "Virginia Law Review",

issn = "0042-6601",

publisher = "University of Virginia",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retaining mandatory securities disclosure

T2 - Why issuer choice is not investor empowerment

AU - Fox, Merritt B.

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347565274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347565274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1073870

DO - 10.2307/1073870

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347565274

SN - 0042-6601

VL - 85

SP - 1335

JO - Virginia Law Review

JF - Virginia Law Review

IS - 7

ER -

Retaining mandatory securities disclosure: Why issuer choice is not investor empowerment

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this