The evolution of university patenting and licensing procedures: An empirical study of institutional change

Bhaven N. Sampat, Richard R. Nelson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent paper (Nelson & Sampat, 2001) we proposed that it is fruitful to conceptualize institutions as "social technologies" that are standard among economic actors in particular contexts. This paper extends the social technology concept to study institutionalization and institutional change, based on a case study of the history of social technologies used by universities to manage their patenting and licensing activities. While at the beginning of the twentieth century, universities avoided patenting and licensing activities, today all research universities have "technology transfer offices" to patent and market faculty inventions. That is, this social technology has become an institution. Based on historical narrative, we argue that the social technologies orientation highlights several important aspects of institutional change that are not prominent in the mainstream institutionalist literatures. Moreover, the evolution of social technologies has interesting parallels to the evolution of physical technologies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe new institutionalism in strategic management
PublisherJAI Press
Pages135-164
Number of pages30
ISBN (Print)0762309032, 9780762309030
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Publication series

NameAdvances in Strategic Management
Volume19
ISSN (Print)0742-3322

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Thrainn Eggertsson provided useful comments on a previous draft. This research would not have been possible without the assistance and enthusiasm of archivists at the National Research Council, the Smithsonian Institution, the National Archives, Research Corporation, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and Columbia University. We gratefully acknowledge the generous financial support of the Andrew Mellon Foundation and Columbia University's Office of the Executive Vice Provost.

Funding

Thrainn Eggertsson provided useful comments on a previous draft. This research would not have been possible without the assistance and enthusiasm of archivists at the National Research Council, the Smithsonian Institution, the National Archives, Research Corporation, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and Columbia University. We gratefully acknowledge the generous financial support of the Andrew Mellon Foundation and Columbia University's Office of the Executive Vice Provost.

FundersFunder number
Columbia University's Office of the Executive Vice Provost
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
    • Strategy and Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of university patenting and licensing procedures: An empirical study of institutional change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this