Abstract
Recent efforts to support state regulation of risky behavior like cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, driving without seatbelts and riding motorcycles without helmets have focused on economic justifications—the costs to society of the consequences of these activities. However, opponents have successfully argued that the economic burdens of regulation outweigh the social benefits. To reduce the toll on society of these behaviors, we need justification for regulation that asserts the moral primacy of health and the well‐being of the community. 1985 The Hastings Center
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 37-41 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Hastings Center Report |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 1985 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Health(social science)
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Philosophy
- Health Policy