The protective effect of condoms and nonoxynol-9 against HIV infection

Knut M. Wittkowski, Ezra Susser, Klaus Dietz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Whether or not spermicides can reduce the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission remains an important question for the control of heterosexual HIV transmission. The authors provide estimates from a reanalysis of one of the few observational studies on the efficacy of condoms and spermicides, used separately and together, per vaginal contact. Methods. In this reanalysis, three different models were used to assess the efficacy of spermicides and condoms: linear (Pearl index), exponential (maximum likelihood), and monotonic (marginal likelihood). Results. Reported use of barrier methods among 27 432 contacts was as follows: condoms plus nonoxynol-9, 39%; condoms alone, 25%; nonoxynol-9 alone, 24%; and unprotected, 11%. Under all three models, the results indicate a strong protective effect for spermicidal suppositories. The Pearl index indicated that spermicide alone is apparently efficacious, but the efficacy per contact cannot be quantified with this approach. Maximum likelihood estimates for the efficacy of nonoxynol-9 alone and condoms (with or without nonoxynol-9) were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI.95] = 43%, 100%) and 92% (95% CI.95 = 79%, 100%), respectively. Conclusions. The data from this observational study suggest that spermicides may be efficacious in reducing the risk of HIV transmission.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)590-596
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1998

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Institute of Mental HealthP50MH043520

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The protective effect of condoms and nonoxynol-9 against HIV infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this