Violent Youth in Adult Court: Process and Punishment

Cary Rudman, Eliot Hartstone, Jeffrey Fagan, Melinda Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the widespread transfer of violent youth from juvenile to criminal court, there is little empirical knowledge of the transfer process, rate oftransfer, or of case outcomes, sentences, and placements of transferred juveniles. This study examines these issues for 177 violent youths consideredfor transfer in four urban areas, comparing court outcomes for youths transferred to criminal court with those for youths retained in juvenile court. Varying procedures, criteria, and court rules result in case processing time averaging 2.5 times greater for transferred youth. Most spend this time in detention. Violent youth considered for transfer are adjudicated at a high rate for the offenses as charged in both juvenile and criminal court. Plea bargainingfor charges rarely occurred. Youth considered for transfer but retained by the juvenile court received maximumcommitments and placements within the jurisdictional limits of the juvenile justice system. Transferred youth convicted in criminal court received even more severe sanctions both in nature and length. Alternatives to incarceration were rarely used by either the juvenile or criminal court.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-96
Number of pages22
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1986

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Violent Youth in Adult Court: Process and Punishment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this