What Research Participants Say about Their Research Experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and Actionable Data

Rhonda G. Kost, Joseph Andrews, Ranee Chatterjee, Alex C. Cheng, Lisa Connally, Ann Dozier, Carrie Dykes, Daniel Ford, Nancy S. Green, Caroline Jiang, Sana Khoury-Shakour, Sierra Lindo, Karen Marder, Liz Martinez, Adam Qureshi, Jamie Roberts, Natalie Schlesinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Research participants' feedback about their participation experiences offers critical insights for improving programs. A shared Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) infrastructure enabled a multi-organization collaborative to collect, analyze, and act on participants' feedback using validated participant-centered measures. Methods: A consortium of academic research organizations with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) programs administered the Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS) to active or recent research participants. Local response data also aggregated into a Consortium database, facilitating analysis of feedback overall and for subgroups. Results: From February 2022 to June 2024, participating organizations sent surveys to 28,096 participants and received 5,045 responses (18%). Respondents were 60% female, 80% White, 13% Black, 2% Asian, and 6% Latino/x. Most respondents (85-95%) felt respected and listened to by study staff; 68% gave their overall experience the top rating. Only 60% felt fully prepared by the consent process. Consent, feeling valued, language assistance, age, study demands, and other factors were significantly associated with overall experience ratings. 63% of participants said that receiving a summary of the study results would be very important to joining a future study. Inter-site scores differed significantly for some measures; initiatives piloted in response to local findings raised experience scores. Conclusion: RPPS results from 5,045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical and Translational Science
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025.

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Research Participants Say about Their Research Experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and Actionable Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Kost, R. G., Andrews, J., Chatterjee, R., Cheng, A. C., Connally, L., Dozier, A., Dykes, C., Ford, D., Green, N. S., Jiang, C., Khoury-Shakour, S., Lindo, S., Marder, K., Martinez, L., Qureshi, A., Roberts, J., & Schlesinger, N. (Accepted/In press). What Research Participants Say about Their Research Experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and Actionable Data. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.3