TY - JOUR
T1 - What Research Participants Say about Their Research Experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice
T2 - Outcomes and Actionable Data
AU - Kost, Rhonda G.
AU - Andrews, Joseph
AU - Chatterjee, Ranee
AU - Cheng, Alex C.
AU - Connally, Lisa
AU - Dozier, Ann
AU - Dykes, Carrie
AU - Ford, Daniel
AU - Green, Nancy S.
AU - Jiang, Caroline
AU - Khoury-Shakour, Sana
AU - Lindo, Sierra
AU - Marder, Karen
AU - Martinez, Liz
AU - Qureshi, Adam
AU - Roberts, Jamie
AU - Schlesinger, Natalie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Research participants' feedback about their participation experiences offers critical insights for improving programs. A shared Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) infrastructure enabled a multi-organization collaborative to collect, analyze, and act on participants' feedback using validated participant-centered measures. Methods: A consortium of academic research organizations with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) programs administered the Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS) to active or recent research participants. Local response data also aggregated into a Consortium database, facilitating analysis of feedback overall and for subgroups. Results: From February 2022 to June 2024, participating organizations sent surveys to 28,096 participants and received 5,045 responses (18%). Respondents were 60% female, 80% White, 13% Black, 2% Asian, and 6% Latino/x. Most respondents (85-95%) felt respected and listened to by study staff; 68% gave their overall experience the top rating. Only 60% felt fully prepared by the consent process. Consent, feeling valued, language assistance, age, study demands, and other factors were significantly associated with overall experience ratings. 63% of participants said that receiving a summary of the study results would be very important to joining a future study. Inter-site scores differed significantly for some measures; initiatives piloted in response to local findings raised experience scores. Conclusion: RPPS results from 5,045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.
AB - Background: Research participants' feedback about their participation experiences offers critical insights for improving programs. A shared Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) infrastructure enabled a multi-organization collaborative to collect, analyze, and act on participants' feedback using validated participant-centered measures. Methods: A consortium of academic research organizations with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) programs administered the Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS) to active or recent research participants. Local response data also aggregated into a Consortium database, facilitating analysis of feedback overall and for subgroups. Results: From February 2022 to June 2024, participating organizations sent surveys to 28,096 participants and received 5,045 responses (18%). Respondents were 60% female, 80% White, 13% Black, 2% Asian, and 6% Latino/x. Most respondents (85-95%) felt respected and listened to by study staff; 68% gave their overall experience the top rating. Only 60% felt fully prepared by the consent process. Consent, feeling valued, language assistance, age, study demands, and other factors were significantly associated with overall experience ratings. 63% of participants said that receiving a summary of the study results would be very important to joining a future study. Inter-site scores differed significantly for some measures; initiatives piloted in response to local findings raised experience scores. Conclusion: RPPS results from 5,045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215074180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85215074180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/cts.2025.3
DO - 10.1017/cts.2025.3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215074180
SN - 2059-8661
JO - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
JF - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
ER -