TY - JOUR
T1 - Anterior Shoulder Instability Part II—Latarjet, Remplissage, and Glenoid Bone-Grafting—An International Consensus Statement
AU - The Anterior Shoulder Instability International Consensus Group
AU - Hurley, Eoghan T.
AU - Matache, Bogdan A.
AU - Wong, Ivan
AU - Itoi, Eiji
AU - Strauss, Eric J.
AU - Delaney, Ruth A.
AU - Neyton, Lionel
AU - Athwal, George S.
AU - Pauzenberger, Leo
AU - Mullett, Hannan
AU - Jazrawi, Laith M.
AU - Alaia, Michael J.
AU - Arciero, Robert A.
AU - Bedi, Asheesh
AU - Brophy, Robert H.
AU - Calvo, Emilio
AU - Campbell, Kirk A.
AU - Carter, Cordelia W.
AU - Cassidy, J. Tristan
AU - Ciccotti, Michael G.
AU - Cole, Brian J.
AU - Collin, Philippe
AU - Cordasco, Frank A.
AU - Edwards, Sara E.
AU - Erickson, Brandon J.
AU - Favard, Luc
AU - Frank, Rachel M.
AU - Funk, Lennard
AU - Garrigues, Grant E.
AU - Di Giacomo, Giovanni
AU - Gonzalez-Lomas, Guillem
AU - Heuberer, Philipp R.
AU - Imhoff, Andreas B.
AU - Kelly, John D.
AU - Khan, Moin
AU - Krych, Aaron J.
AU - Kuhn, John E.
AU - Kwon, Young M.
AU - Lädermann, Alexandre
AU - Levine, William N.
AU - Fat, Darren Lim
AU - Mazzocca, Augustus D.
AU - MacDonald, Peter B.
AU - McCarty, Eric C.
AU - Meislin, Robert J.
AU - Millett, Peter J.
AU - Molony, Diarmuid C.
AU - Moran, Cathal J.
AU - Moroder, Philipp
AU - Rodeo, Scott A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a modified Delphi process on the Latarjet procedure, remplissage, and glenoid-bone grafting for anterior shoulder instability. Methods: A consensus process on the treatment utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted, with 65 shoulder surgeons from 14 countries across 5 continents participating. Experts were assigned to one of 9 working groups defined by specific subtopics of interest within anterior shoulder instability. Results: The technical approaches identified in the statements on the Latarjet procedure and glenoid bone-graft were that a subscapularis split approach should be utilized, and that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required. Furthermore, despite similar indications, glenoid bone-grafting may be preferred over the Latarjet in patients with bone-loss greater than can be treated with a coracoid graft, and in cases of surgeon preference, failed prior Latarjet or glenoid bone-grafting procedure, and epilepsy. In contrast, the primary indications for a remplissage procedure was either an off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs lesion without severe glenoid bone loss. Additionally, in contrast to the bone-block procedure, complications following remplissage are rare, and loss of shoulder external rotation can be minimized by performing the tenodesis via the safe-zone and not over medializing the fixation. Conclusion: Overall, 89% of statements reached unanimous or strong consensus. The statements that reached unanimous consensus were the prognostic factors that are important to consider in those undergoing a glenoid bone-grafting procedure including age, activity level, Hill-Sachs Lesion, extent of glenoid bone-loss, hyperlaxity, prior surgeries, and arthritic changes. Furthermore, there was unanimous agreement that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required with a glenoid bone graft, but it may be beneficial in some cases. There was no unanimous agreement on any aspect related to the Latarjet procedure or Remplissage. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a modified Delphi process on the Latarjet procedure, remplissage, and glenoid-bone grafting for anterior shoulder instability. Methods: A consensus process on the treatment utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted, with 65 shoulder surgeons from 14 countries across 5 continents participating. Experts were assigned to one of 9 working groups defined by specific subtopics of interest within anterior shoulder instability. Results: The technical approaches identified in the statements on the Latarjet procedure and glenoid bone-graft were that a subscapularis split approach should be utilized, and that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required. Furthermore, despite similar indications, glenoid bone-grafting may be preferred over the Latarjet in patients with bone-loss greater than can be treated with a coracoid graft, and in cases of surgeon preference, failed prior Latarjet or glenoid bone-grafting procedure, and epilepsy. In contrast, the primary indications for a remplissage procedure was either an off-track or engaging Hill-Sachs lesion without severe glenoid bone loss. Additionally, in contrast to the bone-block procedure, complications following remplissage are rare, and loss of shoulder external rotation can be minimized by performing the tenodesis via the safe-zone and not over medializing the fixation. Conclusion: Overall, 89% of statements reached unanimous or strong consensus. The statements that reached unanimous consensus were the prognostic factors that are important to consider in those undergoing a glenoid bone-grafting procedure including age, activity level, Hill-Sachs Lesion, extent of glenoid bone-loss, hyperlaxity, prior surgeries, and arthritic changes. Furthermore, there was unanimous agreement that it is unclear whether a capsular repair is routinely required with a glenoid bone graft, but it may be beneficial in some cases. There was no unanimous agreement on any aspect related to the Latarjet procedure or Remplissage. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112560498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112560498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.07.023
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.07.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 34332052
AN - SCOPUS:85112560498
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 38
SP - 224-233.e6
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 2
ER -