How blind is blind? Assessment of patient and doctor medication guesses in a placebo-controlled trial of imipramine and phenelzine

Judith G. Rabkin, Jeffrey S. Markowitz, Jonathan Stewart, Patrick McGrath, Wilma Harrison, Frederic M. Quitkin, Donald F. Klein

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

91 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The purpose of the double blind is to protect the internal validity of a clinical trial by preventing knowledge of treatment conditions from influencing outcome or its assessment. We studied medication guesses of 137 depressed patients and/or their doctors at the end of a 6-week randomized trial of placebo, imipramine, and phenelzine. Overall, 78% of the patients and 87% of the doctors correctly distinguished between placebo and active medication. Clinical outcome, treatment condition, and their interaction each contributed to guessing accuracy, while medication experience and side effects assessed only in week 6 did not. Accuracy was high, however, even when cases were stratified for clinical outcome, indicating that other cues were available to the patients and doctors. These may include patterns and timing of side effects and clinical response not detectable in this end-point analysis.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)75-86
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónPsychiatry Research
Volumen19
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - sep. 1986

Financiación

FinanciadoresNúmero del financiador
Mental Health Clinical Research CenterMH-30906-07
National Institute of Mental HealthP50MH030906

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health
    • Biological Psychiatry

    Huella

    Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'How blind is blind? Assessment of patient and doctor medication guesses in a placebo-controlled trial of imipramine and phenelzine'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

    Citar esto