TY - JOUR
T1 - Meniscal allograft transplantation in the sheep knee evaluation of chondroprotective effects
AU - Kelly, Bryan T.
AU - Potter, Hollis G.
AU - Deng, Xiang Hua
AU - Pearle, Andrew D.
AU - Turner, A. Simon
AU - Warren, Russell F.
AU - Rodeo, Scott A.
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - Background: Early protection of articular cartilage, before degenerative changes appear on radiographs, should result in better long-term results, but scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of meniscal transplantation is lacking. Purpose: To assess the chondroprotective effects of a new meniscal allograft transplantation animal model and evaluate a magnetic resonance imaging parameter, T2 mapping, in articular cartilage after meniscectomy and meniscal transplantation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Forty-five skeletally mature sheep were placed into 3 surgical groups: lateral meniscectomy (n = 24), meniscal allograft transplant (n = 17), and sham (n = 4). Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, or 12 months. Cartilage was assessed by gross inspection, magnetic resonance imaging, T2 mapping, biomechanical testing, and semiquantitative histologic analysis. Results: There were no differences between the sham operation and nonoperated control limbs. Compared with control limbs, meniscectomy resulted in significant increases in cartilage degeneration by all objective criteria (P < .01). Compared with meniscectomy, meniscal allograft transplantation resulted in significant decreases in cartilage degeneration (P < .02). There were significant correlations between T2-mapping data and all other traditional outcomes measures (P < .05, r2 = 0.37-0.67). Compared with the nonoperated control limbs, allograft transplants demonstrated no significant differences at 2 months in any category, except magnetic resonance imaging data. By 4 months, nonoperated control limbs demonstrated significantly less wear compared to allograft limbs in all categories except modified Mankin scores. Conclusion: This model demonstrated significant chondroprotection compared with meniscectomy but demonstrated more cartilage wear at 4 months compared to control limbs. A high degree of allograft cell viability and vascular ingrowth was seen in allograft explants. T2 mapping may provide an accurate noninvasive measure of early cartilage degeneration after meniscectomy, as well as cartilage protection after meniscal allograft transplantation. Clinical Relevance: This study establishes a reliable animal model for meniscal allograft transplantation and provides evidence for the utility of T2 mapping at clinically relevant magnetic resonance imaging field strengths for evaluation of early cartilage degeneration.
AB - Background: Early protection of articular cartilage, before degenerative changes appear on radiographs, should result in better long-term results, but scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of meniscal transplantation is lacking. Purpose: To assess the chondroprotective effects of a new meniscal allograft transplantation animal model and evaluate a magnetic resonance imaging parameter, T2 mapping, in articular cartilage after meniscectomy and meniscal transplantation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Forty-five skeletally mature sheep were placed into 3 surgical groups: lateral meniscectomy (n = 24), meniscal allograft transplant (n = 17), and sham (n = 4). Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, or 12 months. Cartilage was assessed by gross inspection, magnetic resonance imaging, T2 mapping, biomechanical testing, and semiquantitative histologic analysis. Results: There were no differences between the sham operation and nonoperated control limbs. Compared with control limbs, meniscectomy resulted in significant increases in cartilage degeneration by all objective criteria (P < .01). Compared with meniscectomy, meniscal allograft transplantation resulted in significant decreases in cartilage degeneration (P < .02). There were significant correlations between T2-mapping data and all other traditional outcomes measures (P < .05, r2 = 0.37-0.67). Compared with the nonoperated control limbs, allograft transplants demonstrated no significant differences at 2 months in any category, except magnetic resonance imaging data. By 4 months, nonoperated control limbs demonstrated significantly less wear compared to allograft limbs in all categories except modified Mankin scores. Conclusion: This model demonstrated significant chondroprotection compared with meniscectomy but demonstrated more cartilage wear at 4 months compared to control limbs. A high degree of allograft cell viability and vascular ingrowth was seen in allograft explants. T2 mapping may provide an accurate noninvasive measure of early cartilage degeneration after meniscectomy, as well as cartilage protection after meniscal allograft transplantation. Clinical Relevance: This study establishes a reliable animal model for meniscal allograft transplantation and provides evidence for the utility of T2 mapping at clinically relevant magnetic resonance imaging field strengths for evaluation of early cartilage degeneration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747233809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747233809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0363546506287365
DO - 10.1177/0363546506287365
M3 - Article
C2 - 16636346
AN - SCOPUS:33747233809
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 34
SP - 1464
EP - 1477
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 9
ER -