1/4-Optimizing Treatment for Complicated Grief

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This resubmission application is for competitive renewals of our prior grant (MH060783) in which we established the efficacy of a targeted complicated grief treatment (CGT). The current application is to conduct a multicenter study to take the next steps needed to optimize treatment for individuals suffering from complicated grief, and responds to PA-07-092 inviting grant applications for collaborative studies of mental disorders in adults. Complicated grief (CG) is a debilitating condition that is estimated to affect millions of people in the United States alone. Our prior study was the first RCT to address this condition. Participants in our study continued stable antidepressant medication while receiving CGT or Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT). Individuals taking antidepressants had better outcome in both treatments, though CGT was superior to IPT when administered with (60% responders v. 40%) or without (42% v. 19%) antidepressants. Studies of antidepressant medication alone have shown mixed results with SSRIs appearing to be promising. However, there has been no randomized controlled study of SSRIs for CG. Determining the efficacy of SSRI treatment for CG, when administered with and without CGT, is of great public health importance. We have assembled 4 groups of investigators with strong track records in bereavement research and extensive experience with intervention studies and multicenter projects, to conduct a study of escitalopram (ESC) efficacy. We plan to enroll 440 people with a primary diagnosis of Complicated Grief over 4.5 years, and to randomly assign them to receive 16 weeks of treatment with ESC, PBO, ESC + CGT or PBO + CGT. Specific aims are to compare 1) ESC v PBO, 2) ESC + CGT v PBO + CGT and 3) CGT + ESC v ESC on measures of responder status and on improvement in CG symptoms, depression, anxiety, functional impairment, sleep and suicidality. We will explore mediator and moderator hypotheses to answer questions about how these treatments work and who might benefit most from each approach. Answers to these questions have important public health significance.