Ohlson, J. A., Penman, S., Bloomfield, R., Christensen, T. E., Colson, R., Jamal, K., Moehrle, S., Previts, G., Stober, T., Sunder, S., & Watts, R. L. (2010). A framework for financial reporting standards: Issues and a suggested model. Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 471-485. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.471
A framework for financial reporting standards: Issues and a suggested model. / Ohlson, James A.
; Penman, Stephen; Bloomfield, Robert et al.
Dans:
Accounting Horizons, Vol. 24, N° 3, 2010, p. 471-485.
Résultat de recherche › examen par les pairs
Ohlson, JA, Penman, S, Bloomfield, R, Christensen, TE, Colson, R, Jamal, K, Moehrle, S, Previts, G, Stober, T, Sunder, S & Watts, RL 2010, 'A framework for financial reporting standards: Issues and a suggested model', Accounting Horizons, vol. 24, n° 3, pp. 471-485. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.471
Ohlson JA, Penman S, Bloomfield R, Christensen TE, Colson R, Jamal K et al. A framework for financial reporting standards: Issues and a suggested model. Accounting Horizons. 2010;24(3):471-485. doi: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.471
Ohlson, James A. ; Penman, Stephen ; Bloomfield, Robert et al. / A framework for financial reporting standards : Issues and a suggested model. Dans: Accounting Horizons. 2010 ; Vol. 24, N° 3. pp. 471-485.
@article{ac3561794ee84064b70f78ad6a8ee4fb,
title = "A framework for financial reporting standards: Issues and a suggested model",
abstract = "This paper addresses the issues that confront the FASB and IASB in developing a new conceptual framework document. First, we suggest characteristics that a conceptual framework ought to exhibit. Most of these suggestions are based on our critique of the existing framework and the FASB-IASB work in progress. Second, we present a model framework that exhibits these characteristics. We emphasize up front that this framework is quite explicit. It goes to the heart of what a framework document should do: it places specific restrictions on what constitutes admissible accounting standards. The purpose of our effort is to stimulate broad discussion of alternative approaches to foundational documents and to offer a specific example of such an alternative approach.",
author = "Ohlson, {James A.} and Stephen Penman and Robert Bloomfield and Christensen, {Theodore E.} and Robert Colson and Karim Jamal and Stephen Moehrle and Gary Previts and Thomas Stober and Shyam Sunder and Watts, {Ross L.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.471",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "471--485",
journal = "Accounting Horizons",
issn = "0888-7993",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "3",
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A framework for financial reporting standards
T2 - Issues and a suggested model
AU - Ohlson, James A.
AU - Penman, Stephen
AU - Bloomfield, Robert
AU - Christensen, Theodore E.
AU - Colson, Robert
AU - Jamal, Karim
AU - Moehrle, Stephen
AU - Previts, Gary
AU - Stober, Thomas
AU - Sunder, Shyam
AU - Watts, Ross L.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This paper addresses the issues that confront the FASB and IASB in developing a new conceptual framework document. First, we suggest characteristics that a conceptual framework ought to exhibit. Most of these suggestions are based on our critique of the existing framework and the FASB-IASB work in progress. Second, we present a model framework that exhibits these characteristics. We emphasize up front that this framework is quite explicit. It goes to the heart of what a framework document should do: it places specific restrictions on what constitutes admissible accounting standards. The purpose of our effort is to stimulate broad discussion of alternative approaches to foundational documents and to offer a specific example of such an alternative approach.
AB - This paper addresses the issues that confront the FASB and IASB in developing a new conceptual framework document. First, we suggest characteristics that a conceptual framework ought to exhibit. Most of these suggestions are based on our critique of the existing framework and the FASB-IASB work in progress. Second, we present a model framework that exhibits these characteristics. We emphasize up front that this framework is quite explicit. It goes to the heart of what a framework document should do: it places specific restrictions on what constitutes admissible accounting standards. The purpose of our effort is to stimulate broad discussion of alternative approaches to foundational documents and to offer a specific example of such an alternative approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958573950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958573950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.471
DO - 10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.471
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77958573950
SN - 0888-7993
VL - 24
SP - 471
EP - 485
JO - Accounting Horizons
JF - Accounting Horizons
IS - 3
ER -