Associations between self-reported obstetric complications and experience of care: a secondary analysis of survey data from Ghana, Kenya, and India

the Revisioning EmONC Quality of Care Workgroup

Résultat de rechercheexamen par les pairs

2 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Background: Although several indicators have been proposed to measure women’s experience of care in health facilities during the intrapartum period, it is unknown if these indicators perform differently in the context of obstetric emergencies. We examined the relationship between experience of care indicators from the Person-Centered Maternity Care (PCMC) scale and obstetric complications. Methods: We used data from four cross-sectional surveys conducted in Kenya (rural: N = 873; urban: N = 531), Ghana (N = 531), and India (N = 2018) between August 2016 and October 2017. The pooled sample included 3953 women aged 15–49 years who gave birth within 9 weeks prior to the survey. Experience of care was measured using the PCMC scale. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine the associations between the composite and 31 individual PCMC indicators with (1) obstetric complications; (2) severity of complications; and (3) delivery by cesarean section (c-section). Results: 16% (632) of women in the pooled sample reported obstetric complications; and 4% (132) reported having given birth via c-Sect. (10.5% among those with complications). The average standardized PCMC scores (range 0–100) were 63.5 (SD = 14.1) for the full scale, 43.2 (SD = 20.6) for communication and autonomy, 67.8 (SD = 14.1) for supportive care, and 80.1 (SD = 18.2) for dignity and respect sub-scales. Women with complications had higher communication and autonomy scores (45.6 [SD = 20.2]) on average compared to those without complications (42.7 [SD = 20.6]) (p < 0.001), but lower supportive care scores, and about the same scores for dignity and respect and for the overall PCMC. 18 out of 31 experience of care indicators showed statistically significant differences by complications, but the magnitudes of the differences were generally small, and the direction of the associations were inconsistent. In general, women who delivered by c-section reported better experiences. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence based on our analysis to suggest that women with obstetric complications report consistently better or worse experiences of care than women without. Women with complications appear to experience better care on some indicators and worse care on others. More studies are needed to understand the relationship between obstetric complications and women’s experience of care and to explore why women who deliver by c-section may report better experience of care.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Numéro d'article7
JournalReproductive Health
Volume20
Numéro de publication1
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - déc. 2023

Financement

We would like to thank all the people that contributed to the original studies, those who assisted with data collection in all the countries and settings, and all the respondents without whom this work would not be accomplished. We greatly appreciate the Revisioning EmONC Steering Committee that offered their valuable feedback on the contents of this manuscript. Revisioning EmONC Quality of Care workgroup and Technical Advisors (name, affiliation): Lenka Benova, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; Andreea Creanga, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Louise Tina Day, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK; Lynn Freedman, Columbia University, USA; Kathleen Hill, JHPIEGO, quality of care network, USA; Allison Morgan, World Bank, USA; Sodzi Sodzi-Tettey, Institute of Healthcare Improvement, African Region; Dilys Walker, University of California, San Francisco, USA; Catherine Breen, UNFPA, Asia and Pacific region; Jean Pierre Monet, UNFPA, USA; Allisyn Moran, World Health Organization, Switzerland; Moise Muzigaba, World Health Organization, Switzerland; Blerta Maliqi, World Health Organization, Switzerland; Ozge Tuncalp, World Health Organization, Switzerland; Tedbabe Hailegebriel, UNICEF, USA. This work was supported by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Grant ID: INV-001363.

Bailleurs de fondsNuméro du bailleur de fonds
Tedbabe Hailegebriel
Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationINV-001363
World Bank Group
World Health Organization
UNICEF
United Nations Population Fund
Johns Hopkins University

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Reproductive Medicine
    • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    Empreinte numérique

    Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Associations between self-reported obstetric complications and experience of care: a secondary analysis of survey data from Ghana, Kenya, and India'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

    Citer