Résumé
Given growing interest in the neighborhoods in which children live and interact, this article examines current findings and provides a developmental framework for the coming century. Our approach moves away from viewing neighborhood contexts as a form of "social address" to considering the processes through which neighborhood effects might operate on child well-being. Also emanating from this concern, the framework regards neighborhood influences on child development as well as neighborhood contexts per se as dynamic rather than static. Three models are identified: Institutional resources - the quality, availability, accessibility, and affordability of different resources in the community; Relationships - parental characteristics, support networks, and behavior and home environment attributes; and Norms/Collective efficacy - the extent of community formal and informal institutions present to monitor the behavior of residents as well as the presence of physical risk to residents. Building on these models, examples of research incorporating neighborhood change are provided using data on children followed over the first 8 years of life, including an investigation of the dynamics of neighborhood conditions (duration and timing) and an exploration of residential mobility patterns. Residing more years in an affluent neighborhood by age 5 was positively associated with children's IQ scores, and neighborhood affluence at birth and age 5 and neighborhood poverty at age 5 were associated with children's IQ and achievement scores at age 8. In terms of mobility patterns, a majority of families remained in similar neighborhoods over time with the biggest shift in families' circumstances occurring when children were young; most changes in neighborhood economic conditions centered around movements into and out of middle-income neighborhoods. Finally, the last section points to the importance of considering the role of neighborhoods in children's lives in the twenty-first century and identifies the research designs and methodologies scholars can employ to incorporate this developmental framework into their research.
Langue d'origine | English |
---|---|
Pages (de-à) | 263-301 |
Nombre de pages | 39 |
Journal | Advances in Life Course Research |
Volume | 6 |
DOI | |
Statut de publication | Published - 2001 |
Financement
The authors would like to thank the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Russell Sage Foundation, and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for their support. We are also grateful to the National Science Foundation, the NICHD Research Network on Child and Family Well-Being, and the Columbia University Public Policy Consortium. Additional support was provided by the Social Science Research Council's Working Group on Communities and Neighborhoods, Family Processes, and Individual Development. In addition, we thank Pamela Klebanov for her advice on data analyses. We would also like to thank Sandy Hofferth for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Bailleurs de fonds | Numéro du bailleur de fonds |
---|---|
Columbia University Public Policy Consortium | |
NICHD Research Network on Child and Family Well-Being | |
National Science Foundation | |
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development | |
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | |
Russell Sage Foundation | |
Social Science Research Council |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Medicine