Human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in low- resource settings

Louise Kuhn, Lynette Denny, Amy Pollack, Attila Lorincz, Ralph M. Richart, Thomas C. Wright

Résultat de rechercheexamen par les pairs

188 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Background: In many low-resource settings, there are barriers to cytologic screening for cervical cancer. This study evaluates human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as an alternative screening method. Methods: Cervical samples from 2944 previously unscreened South African women aged 35- 65 years were tested for high-risk types of HPV with the use of the Hybrid Capture I (HCI) assay. Women also had a Pap smear, direct visual inspection of the cervix, and Cervicography(TM). Women positive on any screening test were referred for colposcopy. Samples from women with biopsy-confirmed, low- grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (n = 95), high-grade SILs (n = 74), or invasive cervical cancer (n = 12) and a random sample of women with no cervical disease (n = 243) were retested for HPV DNA with the use of the more sensitive Hybrid Capture II (HCII) assay. All P values are two-sided. Results: High-risk HPV DNA was detected in 73.3% and 88.4% of 86 women with high-grade SIL or invasive cancer and in 12.2% of 2680 and 18.1% of 243 women without evidence of cervical disease, with the use of the HCI and HCII assays, respectively. HPV DNA testing with the HCII assay was more sensitive than cytology for detecting high-grade SIL and invasive cancer (McNemar's test, P = .04), and testing with the HCI assay was of equivalent sensitivity (P = .61). Cytology had a statistically significantly better specificity (96.8%) than either the HCI assay (87.8%) or the HCII assay (81.9%) (P<.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified test cut-off values that allow HPV DNA testing to identify 57% of women with high-grade SIL or cancer, while classifying less than 5% of women with no cervical disease as HPV DNA positive. Conclusions: HPV DNA testing has a sensitivity equivalent to, or better than, that of cytology. Since HPV DNA testing programs may be easier to implement than cytologic screening, HPV testing should be considered for primary cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings.

Langue d'origineEnglish
Pages (de-à)818-825
Nombre de pages8
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume92
Numéro de publication10
DOI
Statut de publicationPublished - mai 17 2000

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Empreinte numérique

Plonger dans les sujets de recherche 'Human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in low- resource settings'. Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte numérique unique.

Citer