TY - JOUR
T1 - MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING AND BEREAVEMENT EXPERIENCES AFTER CARDIAC ARREST
T2 - QUALITATIVE INSIGHTS FROM SURROGATES
AU - Deforge, Christine E.
AU - Smaldone, Arlene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - Background Surrogates of incapacitated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) face decisions related to life-sustaining treatments. Decisional conflict is understudied. Objectives To compare experiences of ICU surrogates by reported level of decisional conflict related to treatment decisions after a patient’s cardiac arrest preceding death. Methods Convergent mixed methods were used. Bereaved surrogates recruited from a single northeastern US academic medical center completed surveys including the low-literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (moderate-to-high cut point >25) and individual interviews about 1 month after the patient’s death. Interview data were analyzed by directed and conventional content analysis. Surrogates were stratified by median total survey score, and interview findings were compared by decisional conflict level. Results Of 16 surrogates, 7 reported some decisional conflict (median survey score, 0; range, 0-25). About two-thirds decided to withdraw treatments. Three themes emerged from interviews: 2 reflecting decision-making experiences (“the ultimate act”; “the legacy of clinician communication”) and 1 reflecting bereavement experiences (“I wish there was a handbook”). Surrogates reporting decisional conflict included those who first pursued but later withdrew treatments after a patient’s in-hospital cardiac arrest. Surrogates with decisional conflict described suboptimal support, poor medical understanding, and lack of clarity about patients’ treatment preferences. Conclusions These findings provide insight into bereaved ICU surrogates’ experiences. The low overall survey scores may reflect retrospective measurement. Surrogates who pursued treatment were underrepresented. Novel approaches to support bereaved surrogates are warranted.
AB - Background Surrogates of incapacitated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) face decisions related to life-sustaining treatments. Decisional conflict is understudied. Objectives To compare experiences of ICU surrogates by reported level of decisional conflict related to treatment decisions after a patient’s cardiac arrest preceding death. Methods Convergent mixed methods were used. Bereaved surrogates recruited from a single northeastern US academic medical center completed surveys including the low-literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (moderate-to-high cut point >25) and individual interviews about 1 month after the patient’s death. Interview data were analyzed by directed and conventional content analysis. Surrogates were stratified by median total survey score, and interview findings were compared by decisional conflict level. Results Of 16 surrogates, 7 reported some decisional conflict (median survey score, 0; range, 0-25). About two-thirds decided to withdraw treatments. Three themes emerged from interviews: 2 reflecting decision-making experiences (“the ultimate act”; “the legacy of clinician communication”) and 1 reflecting bereavement experiences (“I wish there was a handbook”). Surrogates reporting decisional conflict included those who first pursued but later withdrew treatments after a patient’s in-hospital cardiac arrest. Surrogates with decisional conflict described suboptimal support, poor medical understanding, and lack of clarity about patients’ treatment preferences. Conclusions These findings provide insight into bereaved ICU surrogates’ experiences. The low overall survey scores may reflect retrospective measurement. Surrogates who pursued treatment were underrepresented. Novel approaches to support bereaved surrogates are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208291351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85208291351&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4037/ajcc2024211
DO - 10.4037/ajcc2024211
M3 - Article
C2 - 39482094
AN - SCOPUS:85208291351
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 33
SP - 433
EP - 445
JO - American Journal of Critical Care
JF - American Journal of Critical Care
IS - 6
ER -