TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple pregnancy
T2 - Knowledge and practice patterns of obstetricians and gynecologists
AU - Cleary-Goldman, Jane
AU - Morgan, Maria A.
AU - Robinson, Julian N.
AU - D'Alton, Mary E.
AU - Schulkin, Jay
PY - 2004/8
Y1 - 2004/8
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess knowledge and practices of obstetricians regarding multiple gestation. METHODS: A questionnaire investigating knowledge and practice patterns pertaining to multiple gestation was mailed to randomly selected American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Fellows and Junior Fellows in January 2003. Fifty-one percent (589/1,146) of the surveys were returned. RESULTS: Statistical analysis included the responses from 430 practicing obstetricians. More than 60% rated their training regarding management of multiples as adequate. Men (56.5%) were older and had been in practice longer than females. Sixty-two percent of general obstetrician- gynecologists managed twins without input from a maternal-fetal medicine specialist An understanding of chorionicity was less than anticipated. The majority of practitioners managed twins according to recent ACOG educational materials. They did not use prophylactic cerclage, home uterine-activity monitoring, or tocolytics. Fort-six percent encouraged prophylactic bed rest The management of breech second twins varied. CONCLUSION: Most obstetricians manage multiples according to current ACOG educational materials independent of maternal-fetal medicine specialists. This survey identified knowledge gaps, specifically in chorionicity, indicating the need to develop educational strategies addressing these insufficiencies.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess knowledge and practices of obstetricians regarding multiple gestation. METHODS: A questionnaire investigating knowledge and practice patterns pertaining to multiple gestation was mailed to randomly selected American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Fellows and Junior Fellows in January 2003. Fifty-one percent (589/1,146) of the surveys were returned. RESULTS: Statistical analysis included the responses from 430 practicing obstetricians. More than 60% rated their training regarding management of multiples as adequate. Men (56.5%) were older and had been in practice longer than females. Sixty-two percent of general obstetrician- gynecologists managed twins without input from a maternal-fetal medicine specialist An understanding of chorionicity was less than anticipated. The majority of practitioners managed twins according to recent ACOG educational materials. They did not use prophylactic cerclage, home uterine-activity monitoring, or tocolytics. Fort-six percent encouraged prophylactic bed rest The management of breech second twins varied. CONCLUSION: Most obstetricians manage multiples according to current ACOG educational materials independent of maternal-fetal medicine specialists. This survey identified knowledge gaps, specifically in chorionicity, indicating the need to develop educational strategies addressing these insufficiencies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344662066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344662066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.AOG.0000132805.79318.99
DO - 10.1097/01.AOG.0000132805.79318.99
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15291992
AN - SCOPUS:4344662066
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 104
SP - 232
EP - 237
JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 2
ER -