TY - JOUR
T1 - Sample Size Needed to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions using Association Designs
AU - Wang, Shuang
AU - Zhao, Hongyu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by grant GM59507 from the National Institutes of Health. The authors are grateful to Dr. Shuanglin Zhang for helpful discussions.
PY - 2003/11/1
Y1 - 2003/11/1
N2 - It is likely that many complex diseases result from interactions among several genes, as well as environmental factors. The presence of such interactions poses challenges to investigators in identifying susceptibility genes, understanding biologic pathways, and predicting and controlling disease risks. Recently, Gauderman (Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:478-84) reported results from the first systematic analysis of the statistical power needed to detect gene-gene interactions in association studies. However, Gauderman used different statistical models to model disease risks for different study designs, and he assumed a very low disease prevalence to make different models more comparable. In this article, assuming a logistic model for disease risk for different study designs, the authors investigate the power of population-based and family-based association designs to detect gene-gene interactions for common diseases. The results indicate that population-based designs are more powerful than family-based designs for detecting gene-gene interactions when disease prevalence in the study population is moderate.
AB - It is likely that many complex diseases result from interactions among several genes, as well as environmental factors. The presence of such interactions poses challenges to investigators in identifying susceptibility genes, understanding biologic pathways, and predicting and controlling disease risks. Recently, Gauderman (Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:478-84) reported results from the first systematic analysis of the statistical power needed to detect gene-gene interactions in association studies. However, Gauderman used different statistical models to model disease risks for different study designs, and he assumed a very low disease prevalence to make different models more comparable. In this article, assuming a logistic model for disease risk for different study designs, the authors investigate the power of population-based and family-based association designs to detect gene-gene interactions for common diseases. The results indicate that population-based designs are more powerful than family-based designs for detecting gene-gene interactions when disease prevalence in the study population is moderate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142250419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142250419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwg233
DO - 10.1093/aje/kwg233
M3 - Article
C2 - 14585768
AN - SCOPUS:0142250419
SN - 0002-9262
VL - 158
SP - 899
EP - 914
JO - American Journal of Epidemiology
JF - American Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 9
ER -