Abstract
A full understanding of organizational and group effectiveness must take into the account the causes and contexts that exacerbate and reduce tension between groups, and the individual psychological mechanisms involved. This chapter attempts to analyze intergroup behavior through a phenomenological lens: examining how people perceive groups, their own and others, and how these perceptions shape subsequent behavior. Two individually based processes, categorization and egocentrism, and two group-based processes, competition over scarce recourses and strivings for positive social identities, allow intergroup hostilities and biases to flourish. Two strategies for reducing intergroup tension, both of which involve transforming representations of the out-group, are discussed. One is a group-based strategy, which involves structurally altering the relationship between groups by increasing their interdependence. The other strategy, perspective-taking, is individually based. Perspective-taking increases out-group evaluations, decreases stereotyping, and decreases the selection of expectancy-consistent information, all through activation and application of the self-concept. Because many intergroup biases are rooted in individual psychological processes, such as categorization and egocentrism, it is suggested that strategies designed to reduce intergroup tensions that build off these biases might be particularly effective. Implications of intergroup conflict and perspective-taking for organizations are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Toward Phenomenology of Groups and Group Membership |
Publisher | JAI Press |
Pages | 85-113 |
Number of pages | 29 |
ISBN (Print) | 0762308621, 9780762308620 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Publication series
Name | Research on Managing Groups and Teams |
---|---|
Volume | 4 |
ISSN (Print) | 1534-0856 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Tina Diekmann, Joe Magee, Don Moore, Maggie Neale and two anonymous reviewers provided immensely helpful feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript. The research was supported by a NSF predoctoral fellowship. The writing of this chapter occurred while I was a postdoctoral fellow in the Dispute Resolution Research Center at Northwestern University.
Funding
Tina Diekmann, Joe Magee, Don Moore, Maggie Neale and two anonymous reviewers provided immensely helpful feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript. The research was supported by a NSF predoctoral fellowship. The writing of this chapter occurred while I was a postdoctoral fellow in the Dispute Resolution Research Center at Northwestern University.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management