From System Justification to System Condemnation: Antecedents of Attempts to Change Power Hierarchies

Paul V. Martorana, Adam D. Galinsky, Hayagreeva Rao

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When will individuals accept or reject systems that subordinate them, when will they take actions that will challenge these status hierarchies, and when will such challenges be more intense, overt, and non-normative? Research suggests that individuals often justify and maintain systems that subordinate them, yet we suggest that there are certain boundary conditions that predict when individuals will no longer accept their place in such systems. We propose a model that examines how multiple factors: A sense of power, emotions associated with power, and perceptions of the system's legitimacy and stability - predict when those in low power will act against authority or when they will act to justify and maintain such systems. We also suggest that the level and type of action taken against a hierarchy changes as more of the elements (i.e., sense of power, emotions, perceptions of the status hierarchy) of our model are present. We predict that the actions taken against hierarchies become more overt and non-normative as more of these factors are present.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch on Managing Groups and Teams
EditorsMelissa Thomas - Hunt
Pages283-313
Number of pages31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Publication series

NameResearch on Managing Groups and Teams
Volume7
ISSN (Print)1534-0856

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From System Justification to System Condemnation: Antecedents of Attempts to Change Power Hierarchies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this