TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of methods to increase repeat testing in persons treated for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia at public sexually transmitted disease clinics
AU - Malotte, C. Kevin
AU - Ledsky, Rebecca
AU - Hogben, Matthew
AU - Larro, Michelle
AU - Middlestadt, Susan
AU - St. Lawrence, Janet S.
AU - Olthoff, Glen
AU - Settlage, Robert H.
AU - Van Devanter, Nancy L.
AU - Paxton, Keisha
AU - Smith, Lisa V.
AU - Davis, Robyn
AU - Richwald, Gary A.
AU - Penniman, Typhanye V.
AU - Gaines, James
AU - Merzel, Cheryl
AU - Messeri, Peter
AU - Bleakley, Amy
AU - Weifuse, Isaac
AU - Cohall, Alwyn
AU - Blank, Susan
AU - Cohall, Renee Mayer
AU - Levine, Deborah
AU - Peake, Michele
AU - Zenilman, Jonathan
AU - VanBlerk, Gillian
AU - Ukairo, Chizoba
AU - Gift, Thomas L.
AU - Pequegnat, Willo
PY - 2004/11
Y1 - 2004/11
N2 - Background: Retesting 3 to 4 months after treatment for those infected with chlamydia and/or gonorrhea has been recommended. Goal: We compared various methods of encouraging return for retesting 3 months after treatment for chlamydia or gonorrhea. Study: In study 1, participants were randomly assigned to: 1) brief recommendation to return, 2) intervention 1 plus $20 incentive paid at return visit, or 3) intervention 1 plus motivational counseling at the first visit and a phone reminder at 3 months. In study 2, participants at 1 clinic were randomly assigned to 4) intervention 1,5) intervention 1 plus phone reminder, or 6) intervention 1 plus motivational counseling but no telephone reminder. Results: Using multiple logistic regression, the odds ratios for interventions 2 and 3, respectively, compared with intervention 1 were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.5) and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.3-5.0). The odds ratios for interventions 5 and 6 compared with intervention 4 were 18.1 (95% CI, 1.7-193.5) and 4.6 (95% CI, 0.4-58.0). Conclusions: A monetary incentive did not increase return rates compared with a brief recommendation. A reminder phone call seemed to be the most effective method to increase return.
AB - Background: Retesting 3 to 4 months after treatment for those infected with chlamydia and/or gonorrhea has been recommended. Goal: We compared various methods of encouraging return for retesting 3 months after treatment for chlamydia or gonorrhea. Study: In study 1, participants were randomly assigned to: 1) brief recommendation to return, 2) intervention 1 plus $20 incentive paid at return visit, or 3) intervention 1 plus motivational counseling at the first visit and a phone reminder at 3 months. In study 2, participants at 1 clinic were randomly assigned to 4) intervention 1,5) intervention 1 plus phone reminder, or 6) intervention 1 plus motivational counseling but no telephone reminder. Results: Using multiple logistic regression, the odds ratios for interventions 2 and 3, respectively, compared with intervention 1 were 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.5) and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.3-5.0). The odds ratios for interventions 5 and 6 compared with intervention 4 were 18.1 (95% CI, 1.7-193.5) and 4.6 (95% CI, 0.4-58.0). Conclusions: A monetary incentive did not increase return rates compared with a brief recommendation. A reminder phone call seemed to be the most effective method to increase return.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044245627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044245627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.olq.0000143083.38684.9d
DO - 10.1097/01.olq.0000143083.38684.9d
M3 - Article
C2 - 15502669
AN - SCOPUS:7044245627
SN - 0148-5717
VL - 31
SP - 637
EP - 642
JO - Sexually Transmitted Diseases
JF - Sexually Transmitted Diseases
IS - 11
ER -