TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus report of the second European Consensus Workshop on Education in Periodontology
AU - EFP workshop participants
AU - Herrera, David
AU - Chapple, Iain
AU - Jepsen, Søren
AU - Berglundh, Tord
AU - Tonetti, Maurizio S.
AU - Kebschull, Moritz
AU - Sculean, Anton
AU - Papapanou, Panos N.
AU - Sanz, Mariano
AU - Aimetti, Mario
AU - Barkvoll, Pal S.
AU - Blanco-Carrión, Juan
AU - Bostanci, Nagihan
AU - Bouchard, Philippe
AU - Buduneli, Nurcan
AU - Cairo, Francesco
AU - Calciolari, Elena
AU - Carra, Maria Clotilde
AU - Christiaens, Véronique
AU - Cosgarea, Raluca
AU - Danser, Monique
AU - Davey, Kevin
AU - De Bruyn, Hugo
AU - Derks, Jan
AU - Dommisch, Henrik
AU - Donos, Nikolaos
AU - Eickholz, Peter
AU - Faria-Almeida, Ricardo
AU - Field, James
AU - Figuero, Elena
AU - Gkranias, Nikos
AU - Goldstein, Moshe
AU - Gosset, Marjolaine
AU - Graziani, Filippo
AU - Gürsoy, Mervi
AU - Harrison, Peter
AU - Huck, Olivier
AU - Iniesta, Margarita
AU - Jepsen, Karin
AU - Eren Kuru, Bahar
AU - Lambert, France
AU - Loos, Bruno G.
AU - Madianos, Phoebus N.
AU - Matesanz, Paula
AU - Meyle, Joerg
AU - Molina, Ana
AU - Monnet-Corti, Virginie
AU - Montero, Eduardo
AU - Nart, José
AU - Nibali, Luigi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Background: The second European Consensus Workshop on Education in Periodontology was commissioned, as a result of the changes in the discipline and the advances in educational methods/technology, to update the 2009 Consensus report of the first European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) Workshop on the same topic that was jointly authored by the Association for Dental Education in Europe. Aim: To identify and propose changes necessary in periodontal education at three levels, namely undergraduate, specialist and continuing professional development (CPD), with respect to learning outcomes, competencies and methods of learning/training and evaluation. Methods: Four working groups (WGs) considered education in periodontology at the undergraduate, specialist and CPD levels, and education methods. Four commissioned position papers, one per WG, summarized the relevant information. Workshop participants gathered at an in-person consensus meeting to discuss the individual reviews, and this consensus report summarizes the conclusions. Results: The learning outcomes for undergraduate and specialist education in periodontology have been updated, and a proposal for learning outcomes for CPD programmes was made. Learning/teaching/training and evaluation methods were proposed for each level of education, which included face-to-face, virtual and blended learning methods. Conclusion: Developments in oral/dental medicine and in contemporary educational technologies have been translated into updated learning outcomes and learning/teaching/ training/evaluation methods relevant to education in periodontology.
AB - Background: The second European Consensus Workshop on Education in Periodontology was commissioned, as a result of the changes in the discipline and the advances in educational methods/technology, to update the 2009 Consensus report of the first European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) Workshop on the same topic that was jointly authored by the Association for Dental Education in Europe. Aim: To identify and propose changes necessary in periodontal education at three levels, namely undergraduate, specialist and continuing professional development (CPD), with respect to learning outcomes, competencies and methods of learning/training and evaluation. Methods: Four working groups (WGs) considered education in periodontology at the undergraduate, specialist and CPD levels, and education methods. Four commissioned position papers, one per WG, summarized the relevant information. Workshop participants gathered at an in-person consensus meeting to discuss the individual reviews, and this consensus report summarizes the conclusions. Results: The learning outcomes for undergraduate and specialist education in periodontology have been updated, and a proposal for learning outcomes for CPD programmes was made. Learning/teaching/training and evaluation methods were proposed for each level of education, which included face-to-face, virtual and blended learning methods. Conclusion: Developments in oral/dental medicine and in contemporary educational technologies have been translated into updated learning outcomes and learning/teaching/ training/evaluation methods relevant to education in periodontology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192231804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85192231804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jcpe.13983
DO - 10.1111/jcpe.13983
M3 - Article
C2 - 38710626
AN - SCOPUS:85192231804
SN - 0303-6979
VL - 51
SP - 4
EP - 37
JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
IS - S27
ER -